Audit Findings

Click here to see the latest audit findings.

As part of the application process to become a Pre-qualified Supplier under the QLD VET Investment Plan, Aspire to Succeed Pty Ltd is required to publish audit information in relation to its compliance with the VET Quality Framework.

Funded programs provide public funding paid directly to Pre-qualified Suppliers for the delivery of accredited training to eligible Apprentices and Trainees.

The VET Quality Framework is the national set of standards which assures nationally consistent, high-quality training and assessment services for the clients of Australia’s vocational education and training system.

A VET Quality Framework audit of a registered training organisation reviews evidence of compliance with the requirements of the VET Quality Framework to confirm that it is achieving quality training and assessment outcomes. The process also identifies opportunities for improvement on these outcomes.

This information is published to assist apprentices, trainees, learners and their employers to make informed decisions regarding their selection of a Pre-qualified Supplier for the delivery of training and assessment services.

Audit Date: 24 March 2020

Qualifications Audited:

• CHC33015 Certificate III in Individual Support
• CPP30321 Certificate III in Cleaning Operations
• MST30616 Certificate III in Laundry Operations
• CPP20617 Certificate II in Cleaning Operations

Audit Outcome:

Was non-compliance identified? Yes

• Yes (concerning Non-Compliance) – written direction issued and completed April 2020
• The organisation has corrected its training and assessment practices for future students to ensure they meet the requirements of the training product

Explanatory notes:

Non-compliance with the VET Quality Framework means that requirements have not been met based on the evidence reviewed. Non-compliances are categorised as minor, significant or critical.

For the purposes of Funded programs, only significant and Critical non-compliances need to be published.

• Minor: No, or minor, adverse impact on learners with no serious breakdown of provision of quality training and assessment.
• Significant:  Significant adverse impact on learners with insufficient focus on quality training and assessment outcomes.
• Critical: Critical adverse impact on learners with widespread or persistent dissatisfaction with